Clinical Outcome of Surgical Management of Diaphyseal Forearm Fracture of Children Using Titanium Elastic Nail
Abstract
Introduction: Diaphyseal forearm fractures are among the most common fractures in the pediatric population. While conservative management with closed reduction and casting remains standard for most cases, unstable fractures, open fractures, or fractures failing conservative treatment often require surgical intervention. Titanium elastic nailing (ten) has emerged as a minimally invasive and effective method for internal fixation, offering advantages of early mobilization, excellent alignment, and rapid functional recovery. Methods: This institutional-based, prospective observational study was conducted at the department of orthopaedics, burdwan medical college & hospital, over a period of 18 months from may 2020 to october 2021. The study included 10 pediatric patients presenting to the outpatient department and emergency with diaphyseal forearm fractures, all of whom were treated with titanium elastic nailing. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants after explaining the study details. The study variables included age, sex, injury-to-surgery interval, postoperative complications, range of movement, and overall functional outcome. All patients were followed up to assess radiological union, range of motion, complications, and functional recovery. Results: In this study of 10 pediatric patients, the majority (80%) were aged 9–12 years, with a male predominance (80%). Surgery was performed within 14 days for most patients (90%), and radiological union was achieved within 10 weeks in 70% of cases. Postoperative complications were minimal, with only 3 patients experiencing issues such as granulation tissue, nail protrusion, or bending. Functional recovery was generally excellent, with 60% achieving full flexion and extension, and 70% attaining full supination and pronation, while minor restrictions were observed in a few patients. Overall, functional outcomes were excellent in 70% and good in 30% of patients, with no fair or poor results, indicating favorable recovery following surgical management. Conclusion: Titanium elastic nailing provides a safe and effective method for the surgical management of diaphyseal forearm fractures in children. It ensures stable fixation, allows early mobilization, and achieves excellent functional and radiological outcomes with minimal complications. Ten should be considered the preferred surgical option for pediatric forearm fractures unsuitable for conservative treatment.Keywords:
Pediatric Forearm Fracture, Diaphyseal Fracture, Titanium Elastic Nail, Surgical Management, Functional OutcomeReferences
1. Cheng JC, Ng BK, Ying SY, Lam PK. A 10-year study of the changes in the pattern and treatment of 6,493 fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 1999;19:344-350.
2. Chung KC, Spilson SV. The frequency and epidemiology of hand and forearm fractures in the United States. J Hand Surg Am. 2001;26:908-915.
3. Mann DC, Rajmaira S. Distribution of physeal and nonphyseal fractures in 2650 long bone fractures in children aged 0 to 16 years. J Pediatr Orthop. 1990;10:713-716.
4. Johnson CW, Carmichael KD, Morris RP, Gilmer B. Biomechanical study of flexible intramedullary nails. J Pediatr Orthop. 2009;29(1):44-48.
5. Lyons RA, Delahunty AM, Kraus D, Heaven M, McCabe M, Allen H, et al. Children's fractures: a population-based study. Inj Prev. 1999;5(2):129-132.
6. Creasman C, Zaleske DJ, Ehrlich MG. Analyzing forearm fractures in children: the more subtle signs of impending problems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;188:40–53.
7. Holdsworth BJ, Sloan JP. Proximal forearm fractures in children: residual disability. Injury. 1982;14:174-179.
8. Sarmiento A, Ebramzadeh E, Brys D, Gellman R. Angular deformities and forearm function. J Orthop Res. 1992;10:121-133.
9. Hadizie D, Munajat I. Both-bone forearm fractures in children with minimum four years of growth remaining: Can cast achieve a good outcome at skeletal maturity? Malays Orthop J. 2017;11(3):1-9.
10. Calder PR, Achan P, Barry M. Diaphyseal forearm fractures in children treated with intramedullary fixation: outcome of K-wire versus elastic stable intramedullary nail. Injury. 2003;34(4):278–282.
11. Khuntia S, Swaroop S, Patro BP, Sahu S. Paediatric long bone fractures managed with elastic intramedullary nails: a retrospective study of 30 patients. Cureus. 2020;12(4):e7847.
12. Hepping AM, van der Sluijs JA, Sinnema S, van Bergen CJ, Kruyt MC, Sakkers RJ. Functional recovery after reduced pediatric fractures of the forearm: a retrospective cohort study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18(1):1-8.
13. Hurley M, Baxter K, Tran D, et al. Management of hypergranulation tissue: a report on pediatric patients. J Pediatr Orthop. 2025;45(1):45-50.
14. Govindasamy R, Karuppasamy K, Perumal R, Gopinath NR. Elastic stable intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fracture: experience in 48 children. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2018;6(1):39–46.
15. Zhang Y, Lin J, Wang Y, et al. Titanium elastic nails vs locking plate in pediatric femoral fractures: a comparative study. Front Pediatr. 2023;11:1114265.
16. Shahrahmani F, Rezaei F, Mottaghi P, et al. Comparative analysis of surgical techniques for pediatric diaphyseal forearm fractures. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2025;34(1):1-7.
17. Khazzam M, Tassone C, Liu XC, Lyon R, Spencer S, Welborn J. Use of flexible intramedullary nail fixation in treating femur fractures in children. Am J Orthop. 2009;38(3):E49–55.
18. Parekh MN. Treatment of paediatric femoral shaft fracture with flexible intramedullary nail. J Surg Pak. 2020;25(1):13–17.
19. Saikia K, Bhuyan S, Bhattacharya T, Borgohain M, Saikia SP. Titanium elastic nailing in femoral diaphyseal fractures of children in 6–16 years of age. Indian J Orthop. 2007;41(4):381-385.
20. Santosha G, Gulrez S. Titanium elastic nailing for paediatric femoral shaft fractures: a prospective descriptive study. Int J Res Orthop. 2017;3:501-507.
Published
Abstract Display: 0
PDF Downloads: 0