A Study of Clinical Profile and Outcome of Shock in Children in Paediatric Intensive Care Unit in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Authors

  • Anirban Manna Department of Pediatrics, Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal 700014
  • Fazlul Haque Department of Pediatrics, Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal 700014
  • Kaushambi Basu Department of Pediatrics, Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal 700014
  • Rupa Biswas Department of Pediatrics, Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal 700014

Abstract

Background: Pediatric shock is a common and life-threatening emergency in intensive care units, with sepsis being a leading cause. Early recognition, risk stratification, and prompt management are crucial to improving outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical profile, laboratory parameters, and outcomes of children presenting with shock in a tertiary care pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) in India, with particular focus on the predictive utility of the PRISM III score. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted on 125 children admitted with shock. Demographic details, vital signs, laboratory parameters, etiology of shock, complications, need for inotropic support, and outcomes were recorded. PRISM III scores were calculated at admission to assess severity. Data were analyzed to identify factors associated with mortality. Results: The majority of children were aged 1-5 years (44%) and male (63.2%), with most residing in urban areas (62.4%). Clinically, increased temperature (73.6%), tachycardia (70.4%), and tachypnea (74.4%) were common, with 55.2% hypotensive and 37.6% exhibiting oliguria. Septic shock was the predominant etiology (60%), followed by hypovolemic (15%), cardiogenic (15%), vasoplegic (14%), and obstructive shock (2%). Laboratory abnormalities included hyponatremia (16.8%), elevated CRP (60.8%), ferritin (43.2%), and deranged renal function (14.4%). Overall survival was 68%, with a mortality rate of 32%, higher among children with septic shock (70%). The mean ± SD PRISM III score was significantly higher among non-survivors (28.15 5.34) compared with survivors (11.48 ± 2.01), indicating its utility in severity assessment. Conclusion: Pediatric sepsis in India is associated with high mortality, particularly in patients with multiorgan dysfunction, deranged laboratory parameters, and higher PRISM III scores. The PRISM III score is a useful tool for risk stratification and predicting length of hospital stay among survivors. Larger multicenter studies using updated sepsis definitions are warranted to better understand the burden and outcomes of pediatric sepsis in developing countries.

Keywords:

Pediatric shock, Sepsis, PRISM III score, PICU, Mortality, Multiorgan dysfunction

References

1. Frankel LR. Shock. In: Behrman RE, Kleigman RM, Jenson HB, editors. Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics. 21st ed. Vol. 1. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2020. p. 262–6.

2. Tobin JR, Wetzel RC. Shock and multi-organ system failure. In: Rogers MC, editor. Textbook of Pediatric Intensive Care. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1996. p. 555-605.

3. Bell LM. Shock. In: Fleisher GR, Ludwig S, editors. Textbook of Pediatric Emergency Medicine. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000. p. 47-57.

4. Perkin RM, Levin DL. Shock in the pediatric patient. Part I. J Pediatr. 1982;101:1639.

5. King EG, Chin WDN. Shock: an overview of pathophysiology and general treatment goals. Crit Care Clin. 1985;1:547-56.

6. Perkin RM, Anas NG. Nonsurgical contractility manipulation of the failing circulation. ClinCrit Care Med. 1986;10:229-34.

7. Sibbald WJ. Concepts in the pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic support of cardiovascular function in critically ill surgical patients. Surg Clin North Am. 1983;63:455-62.

8. Lee EP, Hsia SH, Lin JJ, Chan OW, Lee J, Lin CY, Wu HP. Hemodynamic analysis of pediatric septic and cardiogenic shock using transpulmonary thermodilution. Biomed Res Int. 2017 Mar 16;2017:1-9.

9. Munde A, Kumar N, Beri RS, Puliyel JM. Lactate clearance as a marker of mortality in pediatric intensive care unit. Indian Pediatr. 2014 Jul;51(7):565–7.

10. Fisher JD, Nelson DG, Beyersdorf H, Satkowiak LJ. Clinical spectrum of shock in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010 Sep;26(9):622-5.

11. Watson RS, Carcillo JA, Linde-Zwirble WT, et al. The epidemiology of severe sepsis in children in the United States. Am J RespirCrit Care Med. 2003;167:695–701.

12. Astiz ME, Rackow EC. Septic shock. Lancet. 1998;351:1501-5.

13. Singh D, Chopra A, Pooni PA, Bhatia RC. A clinical profile of shock in children in Punjab, India. Indian Pediatr. 2006 Jul;43(7):619.

14. McGrath RB, Revtyak G. Secondary myocardial injuries. Crit Care Med. 1984;12:1024-9.

15. Artman M, Graham TP. Congestive heart failure in infancy: recognition and management. Am Heart J. 1982;103:1040–8.

16. Carcillo JA, Pollack MM, Ruttimann NE. Sequential physiologic interactions in pediatric cardiogenic and septic shock. Crit Care Med. 1989;17:12-8.

17. Perkin RM. Shock states. In: Fuhrman BP, Zimmerman JJ, editors. Pediatric Critical Care. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book; 1992. p. 287–97.

18. Kleinman ME, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, Samson RA, Hazinski MF, Atkins DL, et al. Pediatric advanced life support. Circulation. 2010 Nov 2;122(18 Suppl 3):S876–908.

19. Kurade A, Dhanawade S. Clinical profile and outcome of septic shock in children admitted to a tertiary care referral hospital. Pediatr Rev Int J Pediatr Res. 2016 Apr 30;3(4).

20. Gobinathan S, Kannan KS. Study of prevalence, etiology, response to treatment and outcome of paediatric shock in a tertiary care hospital. Int J ContempPediatr. 2018;5:1104–8.

Published

2025-08-18
Statistics
Abstract Display: 0
PDF Downloads: 0

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 9 (2025): Volume16,Issue9

Section

Articles