A Comparative Study of Complication of Distal Both Bone Leg Fractures Treated with Fibula Fixation and Conservative Management for Tibia Vs Fibula Fixation and Operative Management for Tibia
Abstract
Introduction: Distal both bone leg fractures, involving the tibia and fibula, present a challenge in orthopedic management due to potential complications such as malunion, nonunion, delayed union, and infection. Optimal treatment strategies remain debated, particularly regarding tibial fixation combined with fibular fixation. Aims: To compare the incidence of complications in patients with distal both bone leg fractures treated with fibula fixation combined with conservative management for tibia and fibula fixation combined with operative fixation for tibia. Methods: This was a prospective study conducted at Calcutta National Medical College and Hospital from January 2021 to February 2022, including patients admitted with distal tibia and fibula fractures in the Department of Orthopaedics. A total of 60 patients were enrolled, divided equally into two groups of 30 each. Data were collected on demographic and clinical variables including age, sex, mode of injury, side involvement, comorbidities, AO fracture classification, wound complications, and fracture-related complications. These variables were analyzed to assess outcomes and compare the two groups in terms of operative parameters, postoperative recovery, and complication rates. Results: Among 60 patients, most were aged 21-30 years (35.0%) and male (58.3%), with road traffic accidents being the leading cause of injury (56.7%). AO A1 fractures were most common (50.0%), and side involvement and comorbidities were similar between groups. Most patients had no wound (83.3%) or fracture complications (71.7%), though Group B had slightly more anterior knee pain and wound dehiscence. Group A had shorter operative time (0.48 ± 0.19 vs. 1.50 ± 0.27 hours) but delayed full weight bearing (16.9 ± 1.9 vs. 14.7 ± 1.7 weeks) and fracture union (26.4 ± 2.0 vs. 22.6 ± 3.1 weeks) compared to Group B. Conclusion: Fibula fixation combined with operative management of the tibia offers better fracture alignment, earlier union, and superior functional outcomes compared to conservative tibial management, though at the expense of a higher risk of surgical site complications. Individual patient factors, fracture configuration, and soft tissue condition should guide the choice of treatment modality.Keywords:
Distal both bone leg fracture, fibula fixation, tibia conservative management, tibia operative management, complicationsReferences
1. Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review. Injury. 2006;37(8):691–7.
2. Rockwood CA, Green DP. Rockwood and Green's Fractures in Adults. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2020.
3. Sarmiento A, Latta LL. Functional fracture bracing: A biomechanical and clinical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63(5):870–8.
4. Bhandari M, Guyatt G, Tornetta P. Randomized trial of reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(12):2567–78.
5. Egol KA, Weisz R, Hiebert R, Tejwani N. Does fibular plating improve alignment after intramedullary nailing of distal metaphyseal tibia fractures? J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20(2):94–103.
6. Sarmiento A, Sharpe FE, Ebramzadeh E, Normand P, Shankwiler J. Factors influencing the outcome of closed tibial fractures treated with functional bracing. ClinOrthopRelat Res. 1995;(315):8-24.
7. Vallier HA, Cureton BA, Patterson BM. Randomized, prospective comparison of plate versus intramedullary nail fixation for distal tibia shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2011;25(12):736-41.
8. Court-Brown CM, McBirnie J. The epidemiology of tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77(3):417–21.
9. Perren SM. Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures: The scientific basis of biological internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84(8):1093–110.
10. Dogra AS, Ruiz AL, Thompson NS, Nolan PC. Diametaphyseal distal tibial fractures- treatment with a shortened intramedullary nail: A review of 15 cases. Injury. 2000;31(10):799-804.
11. Aroor MN, et al. Intramedullary nailing in segmental fractures of shaft of femur. J Orthop Surg. 2025;33(1):123-129.
12. Onizuka N, et al. Surgical timing and postoperative outcomes in distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2025;39(5):245- 251.
13. Xu X, et al. Advancements in the optimization of surgical timing for fracture management. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2025;78(2):302-310.
14. Harris T, et al. Association between operative duration and adverse outcomes in hip fracture surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024;106(10):890-896.
15. Tanavalee C, et al. A randomized controlled trial of teriparatide for accelerating fracture union in femoral fractures. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):1234.
16. Zhang H, et al. Analysis of cartilage loading and injury correlation in knee osteoarthritis. Medicine. 2024;103(21):e23456.
17. Liu DS, et al. Fracture nonunion and delayed union: A review of current concepts. J Orthop Trauma. 2024;38(3):145-152.
18. AO Foundation. AO Spine thoracolumbar injury classification system.
19. Heath DM, et al. Socioeconomic status affects postoperative time to union in pediatric fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023;105(9):823-830.
20. D'Ambrosi R, et al. Anterior knee pain: State of the art. Sports Med Open. 2022;8(1):12.
Published
Abstract Display: 0
PDF Downloads: 0